From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ec90d7920bdc8e8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news.germany.com!news.ecp.fr!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail From: Jacob Sparre Andersen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and licensing Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:05:16 +0200 Organization: Jacob's private Usenet server Message-ID: References: <1190014387.975202.55530@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1190032323.899346.97800@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: taasingegade.news.jacob-sparre.dk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: jacob-sparre.dk 1190232318 22262 85.82.239.166 (19 Sep 2007 20:05:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:05:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gqOMSNR6xDj7pvDH1/ouH8F8FgY= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2039 Date: 2007-09-19T22:05:16+02:00 List-Id: Simon Wright wrote: > Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen wrote: >> I suppose you could also compile with GNAT, and send a library to >> your customers. Still no RTL involved. > > I think that would be the same as distributing an executable. Not quite. > Not aware of anyone having discussed this, but as far as I can see a > .o file would be GPL'd just as much as the .exe's built from it. No. The GPL is on the run-time library. And .o files are not linked, and thus not infected with the license of the run-time library. Greetings, Jacob (IANAL) -- Rent-a-Minion Inc. Because good help is so hard to find.