From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,58253cbf46bbb1fc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Subject: POSIX , Ada, Line Feeds, etc
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:34:01 +0100
Organization: Jacob's private Usenet server
Message-ID: <ygek5kyvk46.fsf@hugsarin.dmusyd.edu>
References: <ygemyq24a5n.fsf@hugsarin.dmusyd.edu>
	<iNktj.34905$yE1.2410@attbi_s21>
	<5bb30e3a-479b-4feb-be5e-e777edf778c9@q78g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
	<eOblWsjJ4lWu@eisner.encompasserve.org>
	<47b883a9$0$26403$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
	<ikZVDle$P9K8@eisner.encompasserve.org>
	<bc0f9b78-814e-4599-86cf-6ddd461f1791@e60g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
	<92e63eb9-6eb0-46ec-8151-94dc81bfc9a3@d5g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: taasingegade.news.jacob-sparre.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: jacob-sparre.dk 1203579241 10825 85.82.239.166 (21 Feb 2008 07:34:01
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:34:01 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AZcuobWgyjMh2RLVAgq0Xw2p9UI=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19939
Date: 2008-02-21T08:34:01+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Karl Nyberg wrote:

> [Posting for Dave Emery, demery@dsci-usa.com, editor of the early
> POSIX-Ada standard, I believe.  Apologies if I inserted this
> inappropriately into the hierarchy of the discussion...  -- kan]

> As one of the most widely used secondary standards, it's
> disappointing to see how few readers on this list lately are aware
> of the POSIX/Ada standard and its success in supporting portable Ada
> applications across conforming POSIX (and Ada compiler)
> implementations.

The pricing of the POSIX/Ada standard reduces its visibility and
popularity significantly.

If the POSIX/Ada standard was freely available in electronic form -
like the Ada standard - then I am sure we would see much more use of
the POSIX/Ada API, and not quite as many hand-coded bindings to the
POSIX/C API.

Greetings,

Jacob
-- 
"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
 make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the
 other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
 deficiencies."                                    -- C. A. R. Hoare