From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3796c9f26082a2b8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-11 14:38:49 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!howland.erols.net!usc.edu!newspeer.cts.com!galanthis.cts.com!127.0.0.1.MISMATCH!not-for-mail Sender: kst@king.cts.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada has no continual line(s) ?? References: <3cf652a0.31278796@news.demon.co.uk> <97xJ8.18262$wd3.3068622@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com> <5ee5b646.0205310650.5d38b770@posting.google.com> From: Keith Thompson Date: 11 Jun 2002 14:38:44 -0700 Message-ID: X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.68.192.180 X-Trace: 1023831524 nntp.cts.com 20854 209.68.192.180 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25765 Date: 2002-06-11T14:38:44-07:00 List-Id: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes: [...] > Actually this is a weakness in Ada. It is not always the > case that you can replace a long string literal with several string > literals concatenated together (it is > interesting to leave this up to the reader to figure > out when it fails :-) Ok, I give up. (I was thinking of pragma arguments, but the string argument to the Import, Export, and Linker_Options pragmas just have to be static.) -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@cts.com San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> Schroedinger does Shakespeare: "To be *and* not to be"