From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b2dd3ff35d68d825 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-14 16:43:08 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!dca1-feed2.news.algx.net!dca1-feed1.news.algx.net!allegiance!dca1-nnrp1.news.algx.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Sender: kst@king.cts.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Unchecked_Deallocation subtleties References: From: Keith Thompson Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 23:42:03 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.68.192.180 X-Complaints-To: abuse@algx.net X-Trace: dca1-nnrp1.news.algx.net 1050363723 209.68.192.180 (Mon, 14 Apr 2003 19:42:03 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 19:42:03 EDT Organization: Allegiance Internet - Greenbelt, MD Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36144 Date: 2003-04-14T23:42:03+00:00 List-Id: Nick Roberts writes: [...] > Presumably the Ada compiler that NASA uses for the Space Shuttle's > flight software will not (and should not) be quite the same as the > Ada compiler I use for my train set controller. Why not? If there's an Ada compiler of high enough quality to use for the Space Shuttle's flight software, why shouldn't you use the same compiler for your train set controller? -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@cts.com San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> Schroedinger does Shakespeare: "To be *and* not to be"