From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,14f7200925acb579 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Keith Thompson Subject: Re: No Go To's Forever! Date: 2000/03/27 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 603165087 Sender: kst@king.cts.com References: <38D7B41D.B3494C6A@lmco.com> <38D7B83B.27DC06C8@earthlink.net> <8b8fha$m1h$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38D8EAC1.2563A49C@quadruscorp.com> <8bg04j$q8r$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Trace: thoth.cts.com 954198456 14870 205.163.0.22 (27 Mar 2000 23:07:36 GMT) Organization: CTS Network Services Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@cts.com Date: 2000-03-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison writes: [...] > The "come from" statement is actually a lot more powerful than the goto > statement though. For instance, multiple "come from"s for the same line > is one way to implement a multi-threaded algorithm. Not the way it's defined in Intercal. If I recall correctly, only one "come from" for a given label can be active at a time. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@cts.com San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> Welcome to the last year of the 20th century.