From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e7604333e40c167 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Keith Thompson Subject: Re: DIANA Date: 2000/06/01 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 630037537 Sender: kst@king.cts.com References: <39366FF8.ECBA862E@averstar.com> X-Trace: thoth.cts.com 959902131 17188 205.163.0.22 (1 Jun 2000 23:28:51 GMT) Organization: CTS Network Services Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Complaints-To: abuse@cts.com Date: 2000-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Tucker Taft writes: [...] > OCS has a compiler based on the old TeleSoft front end, and they had > something approximating DIANA. If you mean "high form", the intermediate language produced by the old TeleSoft front end, I don't think it's a particularly close approximation to DIANA. It may have borrowed some ideas from it, but it's basically a home-grown structure. In particular, I think DIANA is a lot more verbose (though I confess I'm not familiar with it). -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@cts.com San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> Welcome to the last year of the 20th century.