From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,24a59fbc07128ff8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-05 14:19:42 PST Path: newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!newspeer.cts.com!galanthis.cts.com!127.0.0.1.MISMATCH!not-for-mail Sender: kst@king.cts.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: RE: rename missing in Text_IO References: From: Keith Thompson Date: 05 May 2001 14:19:42 -0700 Message-ID: X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.68.192.180 X-Trace: 989097582 nntp.cts.com 235 209.68.192.180 Xref: newsfeed.google.com comp.lang.ada:7211 Date: 2001-05-05T14:19:42-07:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison writes: [...] > I actually think it may well be a good thing to have some kind of > Ada.C_Library package hierarchy in an annex in some future version > of the language for stuff like that, since the C library realisticly > is going to be available on most Ada platforms. Perhaps an > Ada.Directory_Operations would be a good idea too. I think the Ada/POSIX binding covers most of that. > Heck, I'd even > like to see a GUI in the standard, if its possible to agree on a > good one. I don't think it is. 8-)} -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@cts.com San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> Cxiuj via bazo apartenas ni.