From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c76113b004e50a06 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Keith Thompson Subject: Re: Gnat Chat, Random Numbers in GNAT Date: 2000/01/24 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 577064584 Sender: kst@king.cts.com References: X-Trace: thoth.cts.com 948746255 82075 198.68.168.21 (24 Jan 2000 20:37:35 GMT) Organization: CTS Network Services Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@cts.com Date: 2000-01-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: xanthian@well.com (Kent Paul Dolan) writes: > I realize this should go to the Gnat Chat mailing list, but I'm on too > many mailing lists as it is, so my first question is, would it be > appropriate, and would there be any interest in or support for moving > Gnat Chat to a new leaf of comp.lang.ada? I'm assuming without > evidence that the level of traffic would justify a newsgroup, and I > much prefer newsgroup threading to mailing list linearity. The GNAT Chat list is archived at . Older messages are at . Both archives are indexed both by date and by thread. In any case, there's no much point in creating a GNAT Chat newsgroup unless ACT agrees to shut down the mailing list, which seems unlikely. (I personally wouldn't mind, but I don't get a vote.) -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@cts.com San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> Welcome to the last year of the 20th century.