From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f868292008c639ce X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Keith Thompson Subject: Re: 'img Date: 2000/05/25 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 627300454 Sender: kst@king.cts.com References: <390F0D93.F835FAD9@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> <8en5o9$ihe$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8eonos$e70$1@wanadoo.fr> <1fIU4.4668$Rx3.250161@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com> <8g8p31$a2s$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8ggjg3$hbq$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <8gh9lr$ppe$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8ghcbh$rnj$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8gj50o$igs$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> X-Trace: thoth.cts.com 959285518 76638 205.163.0.22 (25 May 2000 20:11:58 GMT) Organization: CTS Network Services Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@cts.com Date: 2000-05-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Peter Hermann writes: [...] > I could imagine, that integer'image(x) and x'image could easily > live together, mmh? No, I don't think an implementation-defined attribute is allowed to have the same name as a predefined attribute. A way to do what was suggested would be to define 'Img(), and allow "for 'Img use ;". The biggest advantage, IMHO, is that it would establish a precedent for specifying 'Image in the next revision of the language. For symmetry, of course, you'd want 'Vlu and 'Wdth. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@cts.com San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> Welcome to the last year of the 20th century.