From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c887193050c097ce X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-11 13:09:16 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.uchicago.edu!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!newshub.sdsu.edu!newspeer.cts.com!galanthis.cts.com!127.0.0.1.MISMATCH!not-for-mail Sender: kst@king.cts.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Problem with GNAT modified GPL and SourceForge References: <3C625604.1C948A06@gmx.de> From: Keith Thompson Date: 11 Feb 2002 13:09:15 -0800 Message-ID: X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.68.192.180 X-Trace: 1013461755 nntp.cts.com 41966 209.68.192.180 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19886 Date: 2002-02-11T13:09:15-08:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol writes: > On 09 Feb 2002 16:04:45 -0800, Keith Thompson wrote: > > An important quibble: "public domain" means entirely free of copyright > > and licensing restrictions. If a piece of software is public domain, > > No I mean "for the common good" or what you choose to call it. I'm not > talking about what is called public domain in the computer license > jargon. I mean that the code is available for anybody. Then please use a phrase other than "public domain", which has a specific legal meaning (at least in the US). If nothing else, using a more accurate term will most likely prevent me from posting annoying followups like this one. 8-)} -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@cts.com San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> Cxiuj via bazo apartenas ni.