From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,1a52c822fc0dbb23 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Rational for not making cursor tagged in Containers References: <1a8y2vakorfhx.225uqh4hifpd$.dlg@40tude.net> <1xmzi7newnilp.23m3zze8h9yi.dlg@40tude.net> <1177066583.5876.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1177080147.5876.87.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1q1kx2jlcvnuj.ck0711mj4few$.dlg@40tude.net> <1177097829.26685.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <95wmj9goo6wc$.13f1j4dnadwws$.dlg@40tude.net> <1177349886.343834.295210@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1177373706.552914.71270@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1ccueevyp8oba.11c8wwyujtw1o$.dlg@40tude.net> <1177432057.705889.229690@n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1op3ml5q11aa$.vg0a2lyc9dpv$.dlg@40tude.net> <1177549092.325163.326870@b40g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1ukuo9arhsjuu.1xhbhqzroadfz.dlg@40tude.net> From: Markus E Leypold Organization: N/A Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:33:09 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uq2FdnwQ6mFN+k4j9Bj0noUvU+0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.225.29 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1177575909 88.72.225.29 (26 Apr 2007 10:25:09 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!out01a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news-fra1.dfn.de!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15333 Date: 2007-04-26T10:33:09+02:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > On 25 Apr 2007 17:58:12 -0700, Adam Beneschan wrote: > >> On Apr 24, 1:19 pm, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" >> wrote: >>> On 24 Apr 2007 09:27:37 -0700, Adam Beneschan wrote: >>> >> Your answer to that didn't really answer the question about predefined >> equality, but went into some stuff about user-defined equality. So >> we're back where we started. Does the predefined equality compare >> just the values, or does it compare the discriminants also? > > The predefined equality compares memory bit patterns. Observe, that for any Does it for tagged types? Regards -- Markus