From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-28 03:30:45 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!cyclone.bc.net!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X Date: 28 May 2003 05:30:43 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com> <3ED3CCAE.C8733E2C@somewhere.nil> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1054117793 20814 192.135.80.34 (28 May 2003 10:29:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 10:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37888 Date: 2003-05-28T05:30:43-05:00 List-Id: In article , Vinzent Hoefler writes: > Gautier Write-only wrote: > >>Hey cool! I would add the possibility of nesting several of >>such comments, or not, and why not also the { } and (* *) of Pascal. >>[some more weird stuff snipped] > > You're not serious, are you? Of course he is not serious. There was absolutely no poorly-designed language commenting convention omitted from that paragraph !