From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9a8c8a29d3e2d7c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s02.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: [Ann] More Ada0Y packages for Ada95!
References: <5a59d6a9.0407301150.348121a8@posting.google.com>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <yFzOc.187518$IQ4.154381@attbi_s02>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.6.132.82
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: attbi_s02 1091225310 24.6.132.82 (Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:08:30 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:08:30 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:08:30 GMT
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2467
Date: 2004-07-30T22:08:30+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>I would like to make a suggestion regarding exception handler. It
>would be better to use Raise_Exception (E => Exception_Name'Identity,
>"useful message") than raise Exception_Name. In fact, it is extremely
>useful in debugging quickly where the problem comes from.
  The usefulness of the message for "raise Exception_Name" is
compiler dependent, so whether the longer form is better is also
compiler dependent.