From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2fcd8539360f166e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-16 15:47:59 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!cyclone1.gnilink.net!wn11feed!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey Creem" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <3DAC4528.81F57BBD@despammed.com> <4519e058.0210161111.217a8c6b@posting.google.com> Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 / Ada / Cygwin / Win2k ? X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.31.5.146 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: sccrnsc01 1034808478 66.31.5.146 (Wed, 16 Oct 2002 22:47:58 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 22:47:58 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 22:47:58 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29854 Date: 2002-10-16T22:47:58+00:00 List-Id: Actually I think the first (and only the first) release of GNAT for NT used cygwin... "Ted Dennison" wrote in message > As far as I know, no one has ever built Gnat with Cygwin. Just > building the compiler from sources the normal way is tough enough; I'd > suggest you try not to blaze any new trails. :-) > > You probably wouldn't want to anyway, as any program so produced would > have to be GPL'ed (unless you've paid RedHat for a GPL-free runtime).