From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,cae92f92d6a1d4b1 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!uucp.gnuu.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Ada.Execution_Time Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <4d05e737$0$6980$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:04:32 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Dec 2010 09:04:32 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 4bf9ae55.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=4Z[R?;Fmd@3^8FBo0_81f>ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1<`=YMgDjhg2^GM=LloHJF0[6LHn;2LCV>[ On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:23:12 -0500, Robert A Duff wrote: > Anyway, the strong syntactic separation between declarations > and statements makes no sense in a language where declarations > are executable code. I think it's just wrong-headed thinking > inherited from Pascal. It still does have sense in a language with lexical scopes. You need some syntactically recognizable point where all things of the same scope become usable. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de