From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-20 15:54:06 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!attbi_s54.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Larry Elmore <ljelmoreat@comcastdot.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031118
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OT: Nuclear Waste (Was Re-Marketing Ada)
References: 
 <slrnbqug4j.ss.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <ZuudnWONTe-cnyyiRVn-iQ@gbronline.com>
 <bor2ji$1h7730$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de> <3FB22125.1040807@noplace.com>
 <botbde$1hvqjj$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de> <3FB3751D.5090809@noplace.com>
 <JtPsb.8014$fB3.463946@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <bebbba07.0311161831.bce38a5@posting.google.com>
 <Az7ub.3669$ZF1.458179@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <1069092089.51926@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <bpib7a$9lb$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <1069341262.907029@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <slrnbrq59k.105.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
In-Reply-To: 
 <slrnbrq59k.105.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <xucvb.194818$mZ5.1448977@attbi_s54>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.1.181.221
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: attbi_s54 1069372445 24.1.181.221 (Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:54:05 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:54:05 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:54:05 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2775
Date: 2003-11-20T23:54:05+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Preben Randhol wrote:
> On 2003-11-20, Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>The proper way to deal with new technology is to give it some minimal
>>amount of testing, looking for obvious problems, and if none are present,
>>go off and use it. If it turns out that problems appear subsequently,
>>clean them up.
> 
> 
> You mean the debrie after a couple of planes went down due to untested
> software?

Straw man. No one said "untested" except you.

--Larry