From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,db5d995d03f4fb4c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-06 16:27:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!cyclone.swbell.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:27:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:27:54 -0500 From: Wesley Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@myrealbox.com Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What Can We do About AdaHome.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.112 X-Trace: sv3-TB2kFGE5xTvOk8XKN6kPELIUIZ5E8ZPWPrWLYQO9XUjJKB99DQambVUyvSXAcWebaNGAKtMRVWWWuA6!SgvQWXystAsQGAwoeNK3uCvSIVbfNjtvKmcX/OgCtl+W+4evWOjdsvcN8qtAjvXrzZ0on6AO6vuo!zvUZ3Q== X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41226 Date: 2003-08-06T18:27:54-05:00 List-Id: >>The problem is that AdaHome continues to be a bad choice >>for anyone trying to get current information about Ada. How >>can we correct this problem? Maybe put some little graphic in the upper right corner of MANY Ada-related web pages, with alt="About adahome.com" and have it link to a page explaining briefly that it's obsolete, ancient, and please don't cite it or link to it.