From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,fea50f781bb229dc,start X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: About static libraries and Debian policy Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 15:16:40 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 May 2010 15:16:36 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 50fbf2df.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=CnY7`P<[ http://people.debian.org/~lbrenta/debian-ada-policy.html requires no static libraries. Is that consistent with GNAT symbolic traceback, which for some unclear reasons is not included into GNAT relocatable RTL. BTW, Why there should be no traceback when relocatable libraries are used? What would happen if g-trasym.o (symbolic traceback) were put into a static library and then linked together with relocatable RTL? -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de