From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 101deb,15c6ed4b761968e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,gid101deb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.28.186.75.MISMATCH!hwmnpeer01.lga!news.highwinds-media.com!hw-filter.lga!fe09.lga.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "John W. Kennedy" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1 Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications References: <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <6H9dg.10258$S7.9150@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1hfv5wb.1x4ab1tbdzk7eN%nospam@see.signature> <2006052509454116807-gsande@worldnetattnet> <1kzktalo9krea$.z8n9wev45xct$.dlg@40tude.net> <2Nwsg.210$Dp4.31@fe09.lga> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:49:40 -0400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.193.246.216 X-Complaints-To: abuse@cv.net X-Trace: fe09.lga 1152586205 68.193.246.216 (Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:50:05 MST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:50:05 MST Organization: Optimum Online Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5602 comp.lang.fortran:11921 comp.lang.pl1:1972 Date: 2006-07-10T22:49:40-04:00 List-Id: robin wrote: > John W. Kennedy wrote in message <2Nwsg.210$Dp4.31@fe09.lga>... >> adaworks@sbcglobal.net wrote: >>> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote in message >>> news:1kzktalo9krea$.z8n9wev45xct$.dlg@40tude.net... >>>> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 21:36:07 GMT, James Giles wrote: >>>> >> PL/I is too old (1964) to have the range trick, > > Can be handled by ASSERT. > >> but it does at least >> strive for portability by specifications such as: >> >> Declare My_number_2 fixed binary(8,0); >> >> If the (SIZE) option is turned on, it will at least check that the range >> is between -511 and +511. > > Actually, -512 to +511. No, PL/I does not demand 2's-complement representation. -- John W. Kennedy "The blind rulers of Logres Nourished the land on a fallacy of rational virtue." -- Charles Williams. "Taliessin through Logres: Prelude"