From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7009ff26a584c028 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!nwrdny01.gnilink.net.POSTED!0e8a908a!not-for-mail From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Dimensions and fixed point types References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:47:09 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.160.201.113 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrdny01.gnilink.net 1086976029 68.160.201.113 (Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:47:09 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:47:09 EDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1398 Date: 2004-06-11T17:47:09+00:00 List-Id: Duncan Sands wrote: > On Friday 11 June 2004 09:26, Hyman Rosen wrote: >>You appear to imply that multiplying apples and apples >>to get apples, on the other hand, *is* "type safe". Why? > > I implied no such thing. Well, here's what you said: > It seems to me that a much better approach would be > to say that multiplication between different fixed > point types is NOT automatically defined This certainly implies that you believe that multiplication of a fixed point type with itself should be automatically defined. How else is one to read this?