From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ee10ec601726fbf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-08 10:16:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!feed.textport.net!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <9prl5701m0v@drn.newsguy.com> Subject: Re: is Ada dying? Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 13:16:13 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 17:16:13 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13945 Date: 2001-10-08T17:16:13+00:00 List-Id: In article <9prl5701m0v@drn.newsguy.com>, Robert*@ says... >Technical Report >CMU/SEI-92-TR-29 >ESC-TR-92-029 >Ada Adoption Handbook: >A Program Manager?s Guide >October 1992 Note that any information in here would have been about Ada83. For the most part, the contents happen to be relevant anyway, but the data in the compiler availability section was talking about the state of Ada83 compilers back in '92... --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.