From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,126ce244c524526b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Tasking issues References: <1186851804.567302.223160@q4g2000prc.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <1186851804.567302.223160@q4g2000prc.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s21 1186859293 12.201.97.213 (Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:08:13 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:08:13 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:08:13 GMT Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1403 Date: 2007-08-11T19:08:13+00:00 List-Id: shaunpatterson@gmail.com wrote: > Of course, this doesn't work as I'd expect. Is there a way to > "timeout" the > first get_name thread... so the OS only waits on that thread for a > short period > of time to allow the other threads to do their business? and then go > back to > the thread? The simple answer to your question is: Yes. Use a delay statement. -- Jeff Carter "I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK." Monty Python's Flying Circus 54