From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d472879e3f609e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-05 12:30:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!wn12feed!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!216.166.71.14!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 14:30:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 14:31:07 -0500 From: Wesley Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Case sensitivity (was Re: no title) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.104 X-Trace: sv3-AebAxvvd+48dAebKnEs8e+ftK2YrcQ6Zl1SPMjCE2X/CmQXVfSQH+0PzHS6IR3Y5r4fXi8R0YpaIF5N!vK/+nPaCHO+YBYo/7SG563ITOJKdrj8551tCI8YGulfTgfveRztgmR3ZeCENFqO8FhkanYSiACCU!W0DQAg== X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38731 Date: 2003-06-05T14:31:07-05:00 List-Id: > I think that's a legitimate argument for case sensitivity. However, I > don't think it has as much weight as all the arguments on the other > side. I also think using Lists and List is just as bad! I was once forced to read a two-inch thick user's manual for a system that had two modes of operation. Almost all commands or operations behaved differently depending on the mode. The manual was printed in all upper case with poor print quality. The names of the modes were: EXECUTION EXECUTIVE Now THAT is a readability issue ! :-)