From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca0b11ae1c9a00cb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Simon Wright Subject: Re: Papers saying Ada as an overly complex language and hard to implement Date: 1998/02/22 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 327478823 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk [158.152.70.98] References: <34E7B551.115C289F@cs.utexas.edu> <34E8AA02.7ED447E0@cs.utexas.edu> <34E91572.CE9CEED2@cs.utexas.edu> <34eb208c.0@news1.ibm.net> Organization: At Home Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: vonhend@ibm.net writes: > Actually, the VAX/VMS C compiler was one of the best in the business. > It generated smaller and more efficient code than any other commercially > available C compiler (with the exception of the GNU C compiler, when it > came out.) But it had idiosyncratic features -- specifically, the system header files were additionally held in modules in a .TLB [text library], so if you felt perverse you could use syntax like #include stdio For some reason, people seemed to feel that because Digital had introduced this [mis]feature you had to use it! What a pain when it comes time to port!