From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,99f33f51845a7793 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-11 13:27:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!shale.ftech.net!news.ftech.net!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!zap!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 'withing' problem Date: 10 Nov 2001 17:57:33 +0000 Organization: Pushface Message-ID: References: <3be27344$0$227$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net> <3BE42900.7590E899@adaworks.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1005513997 nnrp-12:27444 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Nov 2001 17:57:33 GMT X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16298 Date: 2001-11-10T17:57:33+00:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol writes: > On 04 Nov 2001 10:23:48 +0000, Simon Wright wrote: > > Do you think that software designed with mutual dependency is less > > reliable? less safe? more expensive? If there's a compelling argument, > > If it leads to increased complexity, yes! Well, I would agree with you, but since the main reason for allowing this (in the contexts I have in mind) is to _reduce_ complexity, at any rate of the source code, I don't think it's an issue.