From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6963c3030c5f130b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-18 22:26:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GCC 3.X Ada releases Date: 19 Nov 2002 06:26:53 +0000 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <3dd791cb$0$307$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> <871y5kb6ci.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1037687213 13885 62.49.19.209 (19 Nov 2002 06:26:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 06:26:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31086 Date: 2002-11-19T06:26:53+00:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol writes: > chris.danx wrote: > > gcc itself is slower that way back then. That could be having a knock > > on effect on gnat. > > OK. But I guess it is better at optimising? I got the impression from snooping round the mailing list archives that the slowdown was related to introducing new support (possibly for GC within the compiler) rather more then super optimisation.