From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f1e0b399cd01cb0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Simon Wright Subject: Re: Unreferenced lock variables Date: 1999/04/12 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 466016312 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 References: <7ero31$n46$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7esrmv$k1n$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7eta1t$pp0$2@wanadoo.fr> X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 924034736 nnrp-12:14277 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 Organization: At Home Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-04-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "Jean-Pierre Rosen" writes: > Only for non-limited controlled types. If you don't use the variable, > make the type limited. It makes no difference, and the AI ensures that > Initialization/Finalization is NOT optimized away. Strictly, I suppose, the AI only adds weight to a complaint to your compiler vendor when he's got it wrong ..