From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa2cc518ef3b992c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: tagged types extensions - language design question
Date: 2000/02/01
Message-ID: <x7vya94oew5.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 580931294
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
References: <s90mu0hg7q538@corp.supernews.com>
 <3895EC61.9B2157A8@rational.com>
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 949520527 nnrp-04:2258 NO-IDENT
 pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
Organization: At Home
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
Date: 2000-02-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Mark Lundquist <mark@rational.com> writes:

>     type T1 is new T with
>             record
>                     Something_Public: Whatever;
>             private
>                     Something_Private: Whatever;
>             end record;

Quite often I find that the full extension requires entities that I
would much rather defer until the private part of the package.