From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f948976d12c7ee33 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-22 12:00:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Boeing and Dreamliner Date: 22 Jun 2003 19:59:18 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1056308406 26116 62.49.19.209 (22 Jun 2003 19:00:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:00:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39575 Date: 2003-06-22T19:59:18+01:00 List-Id: Dennis Lee Bieber writes: > Lazy programmers who didn't check the performance spec for their > attempted reuse caused the crash As I understand it, project management decided to reuse the Ariane 4 software and would not allow anyone to check performance againse the new flight profile. I don't believe this sort of problem could ever be just down to lazy programmers, that implies a completely laissez-faire attitude on the part of engineering management, design authorities, system engineering ...