From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38c30507c308a2ef X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Simon Wright Subject: Re: Installing gnat in Linux Date: 1998/07/07 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 369133798 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 References: <6mocs6$cfh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <358FE086.11351878@cl.cam.ac.uk> <359E5047.379805CF@swipnet.se> <359FE25D.64DA6667@swipnet.se> <35A00842.61153584@cl.cam.ac.uk> <1998Jul6.090130.1@eisner> <35A0F843.51A35A31@silver.jhuapl.edu> X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 899789083 nnrp-07:6269 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 Organization: At Home Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-07-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Scott Ingram writes: > Larry Kilgallen wrote: > > > > In article <35A00842.61153584@cl.cam.ac.uk>, Markus Kuhn writes: > > > > There is no need to recompile GNAT on any Linux version. The binary > > > version on work on any Linux distribution, > > > > The only binary versions I saw there just now are for I386 and I486. > > > > Nothing for Alpha, Sun. etc. > > > > Am I misunderstanding the NYU naming convention, or should the quoted > > statement be qualified as only applying to Intel ? > > > > Larry Kilgallen > > No there are indeed binaries for Alpha (OSF 3.2 and 4.0) and Sun, > Solaris and Irix there. Depending on your ftp client, it may be > easier to pick out the binaries with a command like "ls > *.bin.tar.gz," which shows me only the binaries. Linux is available on Alpha, SPARC ant other platforms, but GNAT is not available off-the-shelf for Linux on those other platforms.