From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a46843ba8cee64d2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-21 02:05:25 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!zap!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: dinamic object reclamation
Date: 19 Sep 2001 20:51:08 +0100
Organization: Pushface
Message-ID: <x7vwv2vdknn.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
References: <9oa69d$6ej$1@ns.omskelecom.ru>
 <Il2q7.5710$p77.19060@www.newsranger.com> <9oahqo$3on$1@ns.omskelecom.ru>
 <No4q7.5962$p77.20714@www.newsranger.com> <9oangi$dp8$1@ns.omskelecom.ru>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1001049903 nnrp-10:24940 NO-IDENT
 pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Sep 2001 19:51:08 GMT
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13224
Date: 2001-09-19T19:51:08+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Anisimkov" <anisimkov@yahoo.com> writes:

> > >But there is more then limit of memory usage
> > >becouse I wrote
> > >      for Block_Ptr'Storage_Size use Integer'Last;
> > >inside of procedure "act".
> > >
> > >and memory is not leaking now.
> >
> > >It looks like a trick.
> >
> > Well, it is. But it is clearly one that was placed into the language on
> purpose.
> > :-)
> 
> The one reasonable explanation i can imagine is
> that when we declearing
>       for Block_Ptr'Storage_Size use Integer'Last;
> GNAT creates storage_pool locally in the "act" procedure.
> and when we are leaving this procedure
> storage pool Finalized.

Exactly so.

> Could be nice to have standard way to declate
> access type with a local storage pool.

I rather think that this is it!