From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fba8595cda50c2ec
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-31 12:36:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada automatic code generation for Simulink models
Date: 31 May 2002 20:21:05 +0100
Organization: Pushface
Sender: simon@smaug
Message-ID: <x7vwutki0ny.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <3CF539BA.32BE0D15@NOSPAM.visteon.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1022873720 nnrp-01:19856 NO-IDENT
 pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25114
Date: 2002-05-31T20:21:05+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

John Kern <jkern3@NOSPAM.visteon.com> writes:

> I see that the Mathworks is dropping support for automatically
> generating Ada code from Simulink models.  Has anyone from this
> group tried this product for developing control software and found
> it to be less than useful?  There seems to be a big push in the
> automotive industry for auto code generation of embedded
> controllers.  Too bad that we seem to be stuck with C.

I don't see quite why it matters, if you trust the generator? The C is
likely to be pretty readable (well, I guess I mean regularly
structured). Unless you get to modify the generated code ..