From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa18fb47ddd229a7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-13 08:59:57 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!easynet-monga!easynet.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Proposed change to BC iterator parameters Date: 13 Dec 2003 16:57:15 +0000 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <916oa1-c93.ln1@beastie.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1071334796 1388 62.49.19.209 (13 Dec 2003 16:59:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:59:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3445 Date: 2003-12-13T16:57:15+00:00 List-Id: Dennis Lee Bieber writes: > FORTRAN is a bit worse than that -- since a COMMON block only defines > a (named) block of memory containing variables, and other files naming > the same COMMON don't even have to use the same type of variables in > the same order... Think Unchecked_Conversion between n-Record types When I wrote (VAX/VMS) Fortran 77 I used to put common blocks in include files -- is there any other way to do it?! -- Simon Wright 100% Ada, no bugs.