From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc5c0fdbfd63e56a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Simon Wright Subject: Re: general comment on CLA Date: 1997/09/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 274351346 References: <1997Sep19.103110.1@eisner> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk [158.152.70.98] Organization: At Home Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-09-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > Really I was trying to get a sense of how people feel about these > cross-posted threads. If generally CLA folks feel they are reasonable, > then I certainly don't want to try to impose my views, but it is > certainly not illogical for me to find it too much of a waste of time > to wade through more cross-posted stuff. > > On the other hand, if others generally agree, perhaps we could conduct > a cleanup campaign :-) I've been skipping the Eiffel ramblings except where someone interesting (eg, Robert) has been contributing I guess the beginnings of a cleanup campaign would be to be extra careful when replying to crossposted articles ..