From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,98c463a9e98cfdf5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-12 12:45:15 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada exceptions. unchecked? Date: 12 Jun 2002 20:25:07 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug Message-ID: References: <8db3d6c8.0206112300.3965a62b@posting.google.com> <3D0750F1.7A12342@raytheon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1023910781 nnrp-10:20434 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25818 Date: 2002-06-12T20:25:07+01:00 List-Id: Mark Johnson writes: > Larry Kilgallen wrote: > > > > In article <8db3d6c8.0206112300.3965a62b@posting.google.com>, nma124@hotmail.com (steve_H) writes: > > > I have thought that Ada exceptions were unchecked, is this correct? > > > > What do you mean by "unchecked" ? > > After a quick review of the web site he referenced, I believe he is > referring to the need in Java to either... > - catch the exception > - declare that the exception is thrown or (quite often) declare the exception as being of a type (RunTimeException???) that you don't have to quote in the "throws" section ..