From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a5467dded7223af X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-07 12:55:52 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Building documentation from comments Date: 07 Nov 2002 20:55:57 +0000 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <3dc7f605$0$303$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> <3dc8d6e1$0$301$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1036702551 15774 62.49.19.209 (7 Nov 2002 20:55:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 20:55:51 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30554 Date: 2002-11-07T20:55:57+00:00 List-Id: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes: > P.S. May be the best solution would be if I would find time to > modify Booch source in such the way that it would become fully > compatible with AdaBrowse. Is Boch author here? Would you include my > changes in the next release and continue to follow my policy for > compatibility with AdaBrowse? I guess that depends on how much work it is, for how much gain. At the moment I am having trouble with AdaBrowse. My fault for trying to compile with GCC 3.3, of course.