From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-31 06:28:18 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!diablo.theplanet.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X Date: 31 May 2003 14:27:41 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@localhost Message-ID: References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com> <3ED4A94C.2020501@noplace.com> <3ED6A852.75AC0133@adaworks.com> <3ED74ED3.4020505@noplace.com> <3ED7C8C5.3070902@cogeco.ca> <3ED826BB.9010509@noplace.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1054387697 3161 62.49.19.209 (31 May 2003 13:28:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 13:28:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.93 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38207 Date: 2003-05-31T14:27:41+01:00 List-Id: Marin David Condic writes: > Should a Standard Ada > Container Library be based on generics or based on tagged types? Let's > start that debate here and see how far it goes! (Less filling! Tastes > great!!!) Only one possible answer there - BOTH!! (which of course is what the BCs do, and is therefore a Good Thing).