From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,59e7405b37921f3e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-20 23:49:37 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A good way to name instantiated children? Date: 21 Jun 2003 07:48:48 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1056178176 18008 62.49.19.209 (21 Jun 2003 06:49:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 06:49:36 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39516 Date: 2003-06-21T07:48:48+01:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake writes: > I solve this by prefixing Gen_ to the generic package names: I've used the suffix _G (still in >1 mind about it, though!)