From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1116ece181be1aea
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-02 12:32:20 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is the Writing on the Wall for Ada?
Date: 02 Oct 2003 20:30:27 +0100
Organization: Pushface
Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org
Message-ID: <x7vvfr7igj0.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
References: <NGs6b.10770$Pa1.519789@read1.cgocable.net>
 <vhieky4922o.fsf@niu.ifi.uio.no> <ud6dolepw.fsf@nasa.gov>
 <1064527575.648809@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3F739C1D.4030907@attbi.com>
 <uoex8i8i9.fsf@earthlink.net> <na5fnvcqjdvjbutt1s7hu9mhqadjk4jemb@4ax.com>
 <3F78E850.8010401@comcast.net>
 <slrnbniahu.g9.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3F797748.3000203@noplace.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1065123138 3227 62.49.19.209 (2 Oct 2003 19:32:18
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:130
Date: 2003-10-02T20:30:27+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Marin David Condic <nobody@noplace.com> writes:

> I suppose it would not hurt too much to make a Bounded_String
> version. More for completeness than anything else. (It would look
> kind of silly to be able to do a Get_Line or Put_Line of String or
> Unbounded_String but not Bounded_String, right?) But I'd be curious
> to know if there is *anybody* out there using Bounded_String on a
> regular basis. (Maybe it should be depricated?)

We are using bounded strings. I guess unbounded strings with an
overridable storage pool would do too.