From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a0a9e20706a8332
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-08 23:54:01 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!zap!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT naming convention for seperate?
Date: 09 Jun 2001 07:36:30 +0100
Organization: CodeFella
Message-ID: <x7vu21qjh1t.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
References: <3B2102E9.729F3F9@sonetcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 992069601 nnrp-14:10122 NO-IDENT
 pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jun 2001 06:36:30 GMT
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8479
Date: 2001-06-09T06:36:30+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Harry E. Tucker" <snagaghash@sonetcom.com> writes:

> Hi,
> 
> What is the naming convention for seperate procedures? Yes, I'm being
> lazy here. I've looked around the docs and just can't find a reference.

If you have

  separate (Foo.Bar)
  procedure P is ....

it needs to be in file

  foo-bar-p.adb

(you could of course always have run gnatchop on the source file to
get the answer!)

Or perhaps -- what _do_ you mean by "naming convention for seperate
procedures"? (NB spelling of "sepArate")