From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5072448cfe6241eb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-16 22:25:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How does this look? Date: 17 Jul 2002 06:08:56 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug Message-ID: References: <_DcY8.524447$cQ3.46097@sccrnsc01> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1026883476 nnrp-01:7758 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27177 Date: 2002-07-17T06:08:56+01:00 List-Id: Caffeine Junky writes: > Basically, I'm working at learning a bunch of different ways of > handling memory. Storage Pools is one among many. An Indexed array > is another. Using Unchecked_Deallocation on everything is yet > another(although not necessarily the wisest)way. Of course if you use a storage pool you still say new and Unchecked_Deallocation. And you can just as easily get garbage.