From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7350da5176edec2c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-24 16:16:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: In a pickle. Date: 24 Jul 2002 23:59:31 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1027552524 nnrp-10:18293 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27375 Date: 2002-07-24T23:59:31+01:00 List-Id: "chris.danx" writes: > Does this mean that in the above assignment Iterator is finalized > after Next (Iterator) is evaluated but before the assignment takes > place? That would mean that a suitably coded finalize would do the > job, correct? a := b; I'm not sure whether a has to be finalized after b has been evaluated. However, disregarding that, what happens is finalize the old a overwrite a with a bitwise copy of b adjust the overwritten a It gets recursive if a has components which themselves have finalize/adjust.