From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d841c019952cb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-03 14:06:56 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA Tasks Date: 03 Dec 2002 22:06:44 +0000 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <9kfpuu4vlb0vm2j74911icc17b4cme21kc@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1038953215 17111 62.49.19.209 (3 Dec 2002 22:06:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 22:06:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31394 Date: 2002-12-03T22:06:44+00:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov writes: {re: tasks vs protected objects > But both have the same problem, they do not very support > refactoring. Neigther protected object nor task can be extended or > split, leaving the interface intact. Do you have something in mind that allows refactoring _and_ concurrency?