From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b9c1962801ad6b73 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-22 15:07:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.uchicago.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newspump.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Fussy Standard: what is modulo Address? Date: 22 Jan 2003 23:06:29 +0000 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <3e2f1663$0$33931$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1043276839 1580 62.49.19.209 (22 Jan 2003 23:07:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 23:07:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33360 Date: 2003-01-22T23:06:29+00:00 List-Id: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes: > The manual should define relations between System.Address and > System.Storage_Element.Integer_Address. To define these seems being > just forgotten. No these relations which should be true accordingly > human intuition may have bad impact on reliability. It seems to me that when the ARM goes to some trouble to say that System.Address is implementation-defined it is probably deliberate. And there is a perfectly clear relation between System.Address and System.Storage_Elements.Integer_Address in the functions System.Storage_Elements.To_Address, To_Integer.