From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8cca2e0315177d3b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Instantiating a generic formal procedure with an access procedure
 value
Date: 2000/01/13
Message-ID: <x7vso02zdip.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 572269499
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
References: <84guh6$emh$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3870E3F1.906FDFF4@averstar.com>
 <84rnbm$8jo$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38725A42.2961CEFC@averstar.com>
 <84u97t$uut$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <85ifd2$bae$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <x7vpuv7t2zb.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk> <85jho4$5a9$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 947797705 nnrp-04:9837 NO-IDENT
 pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98
Organization: At Home
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
Date: 2000-01-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jeff Carter <jrcarter001@my-deja.com> writes:

> OK, Tucker Taft's favorite front end accepts the instantiation, but
> GNAT does not. Now hopefully the language lawyers and compiler
> implementers will answer (or argue) the question: Which is correct?

If I were you I'd send the report along to report@gnat.com
anyway.