From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8bc34e14e4555720 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-11 12:59:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!newshub2.home.com!news.home.com!newshub1.nl.home.com!news.nl.home.com!bullseye.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!zap!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: GRASP (was Re: This is a simple question) Date: 10 Oct 2001 07:07:23 +0100 Organization: Pushface Message-ID: References: <9pk4t7$tbm$1@trog.dera.gov.uk> <87zo762rta.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <9pkc0r$m5j$1@trog.dera.gov.uk> <9pkddm$afh$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9pvdp5$8im$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9pvk11$oke$1@news.huji.ac.il> <3BC35E72.BB1C3188@worldnet.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1002830336 nnrp-08:20816 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:158.152.70.98 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Oct 2001 06:07:23 GMT X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14327 Date: 2001-10-10T06:07:23+00:00 List-Id: James Rogers writes: > That is one of the reasons I like to use GRASP from Auburn University. > (www.eng.auburn.edu/grasp). > > It is as easy to learn as AdaGide. It has a decent integration with the > debugger, and it allows the user to generate Control Structure > Diagrams right on the source screen. And it also has (well, had last time I came in contact) an idiosyncratic view of how code should be formatted. Made it a total pain to use for development under any sort of source code control system, I thought .. .. though perhaps I was just put off by the fact that my work was done in emacs, and a potential co-worker used GRASP. It was quite impossible to see where his changes were. Do you find the CSDs useful? I recently wrote a 200 line procedure with no LOOPs, two IFs and a CASE (since removed into a dispatching operation). The loops went into closed iterators -- so they were _there_, of course, just not at the application level.