From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c1892715ffb825c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-02 08:49:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pogner.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Exceptions in GNAT Date: 02 Jun 2002 16:34:03 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug Message-ID: References: <3CF9FB01.2070101@yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1023032905 nnrp-10:8692 NO-IDENT pogner.demon.co.uk:62.49.19.209 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25205 Date: 2002-06-02T16:34:03+01:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol writes: > I would recommend that you use the gnat 3.14p compiler instead. The > reason is that the gcc 3.1 is very fresh and the compiler is > reported to have some problems. So as you now learn Ada I think you > can get seriously confused if you stumble over these bugs. At least > use both and if you see a difference you can report it. Robert Dewar said that there are problems shown by the internal ACT test suite, but I have to say I haven't found anything yet .. and I don't recall any problem reports to the gcc mailing list, there are maybe a couple of open GNATS PRs .. I'm using it for the Booch Components, no problems yet (well, one perhaps, but it's also in 3.14p, and I'm not at all sure it's a bug)