From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a6c65cbc407987fe X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-19 13:41:50 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!colt.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: dynamic multithreading Date: 19 Nov 2002 21:41:49 +0000 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <3DD3D841.CD16A4CB@canal-plus.fr> <8MCB9.8643$8o1.1371873@news.xtra.co.nz> <3DD8AEAC.241AD1F8@canal-plus.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1037742110 28673 62.49.19.209 (19 Nov 2002 21:41:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:41:50 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31117 Date: 2002-11-19T21:41:49+00:00 List-Id: Lutz Donnerhacke writes: > * Simon Wright wrote: > > Lutz Donnerhacke writes: > >> Simple. The access variable has a local scope and all objects associated > >> with it are automatically freed when the type goes out of scope. You may > >> limit the pool size of this access type ... > > > > If you look at the code in question you will see that the type is not > > local (to the loop). It is local to the given subprogram, but the loop > > is endless in the subprogram. > > I saw this and therefore noted the limitation of the pool. Oh, sorry, misunderstanding: did you mean "If you want to achieve this effect, you must give the access type a local scope [and set 'Storage_Size] and then all objects associated with it are automatically freed when the type goes out of scope."? I thought you were discussing the posted code .. > > I agree that on a modern hosted OS like Linux or Windows, when you > > terminate the main program the memory it has allocated will be > > restored. But that will not do you much good if your os is eg VxWorks. > > I do not talk about termination. Some of us have no choice.