From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c35edbbda4c7f58f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!194.117.148.138.MISMATCH!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!mutlu.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Conditional compilation in Ada? Date: 20 Nov 2004 16:57:35 +0000 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <419CE3F5.6010906@mailinator.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1100970261 7833 62.49.19.209 (20 Nov 2004 17:04:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:04:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6301 Date: 2004-11-20T16:57:35+00:00 List-Id: "Steve" writes: > Prior to reading about it here, I had assumed that it was not possible to > create an instance of an object with abstract methods. If that proves to be > the case, I think its a good thing. See http://www.adaic.org/standards/95aarm/html/AA-3-9-3.html -- in particular, (3) says that if the operation is abstract so must the type be, (1) says there can't be objects of abstract types. -- Simon Wright 100% Ada, no bugs.