From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,92d1af21ade61406
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-29 23:49:46 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Problems with 'class, help anyone?
Date: 30 Oct 2002 07:49:54 +0000
Organization: Pushface
Sender: simon@smaug
Message-ID: <x7vr8e8wel9.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <pan.2002.10.29.04.48.24.252092@student.liu.se>
 <3DBE2593.9080800@worldnet.att.net>
 <pan.2002.10.30.05.27.31.99377@student.liu.se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1035964185 16096 62.49.19.209 (30 Oct 2002 07:49:45
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:49:45 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30217
Date: 2002-10-30T07:49:54+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"M�rten Woxberg" <marwo264@student.liu.se> writes:

> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 06:08:40 +0000, Jim Rogers wrote:
> 
> > M�rten Woxberg wrote:
> > 
> <snip> 
> 
> > I see you are doing something *almost* exactly the same. The almost seems
> > to be your problem.
> > 
> > The GNAT error messages are pretty clear. To give you a detailed analysis of
> > your code I would need to see your code, not just the compiler error messages.
> 
> Ok I've tried the Code from the webpage now and that produces the same
> errors.. thus it doesnt work with gnat either.. gnat is version 3.13 and
> the code on the page was tested with 3.03 and 3.06 so it should
> work shouldn't it?

No, sorry! GNAT's error checking has become much more severe (correct)
since then.